Mengumumkan ketibaan Nikon D200!!!

[petrofsky]

Huhuhhh ... tak soba den nak tunggu kamera besh ni kuar kat kedai ...

http://www.dearingfilm.com/d200.html

[cgmulia]

d70s tak jadik lah yek???

[eastone]

wahh...wireless speedlight tuh...
kalau harga dia RM6k++ amacam bro??
D100 pun RM5k++..

tenkiu...

[petrofsky]

Memang la di jangkakan yang rege dia akan lam lingkungan RM7K camtu ... sebab body dia magnesium alloy, lagi sturdy drpd D70/70s.

P/S: Cgmulia, sori la ... aku rasa tak jadik la nak call ko ... aku rasa better aku simpan duit tunggu kamera ni jer lah ... worth it ...

[abahwafi]

Mesti reganyer around RM7,999...iskhhhhh

[petrofsky]

Sedikit lagi info tentang kamera ini:

Body
Magnesium alloy frame

Sensor
23.7 x 15.7 mm CCD sensor
DX format
RGB Color Filter Array
Built-in fixed low-pass filter
10.4 million effective pixels
3:2 aspect ratio
High speed cropped - NO

Viewfinder
Optical-type fixed eye-level pentaprism
Built-in diopter adjustment (-3 to +1m-1)
Eyepiece shutter provided
Eyepoint: 19.9 mm (at -1.0m-1)
Frame coverage 100%
Viewfinder magnification approx 0.86x with 50 mm f/1.4 lens

File formats
NEF (12-bit RAW)
NEF + JPEG
JPEG (EXIF 2.2)

Color space
sRGB (2 modes)
Adobe RGB (2 modes)
sYCC

Lens mount
Nikon F mount
Full size image: 1.5x field of view crop
High speed cropped: NO

Auto Focus
11 area TTL
Multi-CAM2000-ll ( 3 cross sensor)
AF working range: -1 to 19 EV (ISO 100, normal temperature)
AF Assist White light lamp

Sensitivity
Auto
ISO 100 - 1600

Metering modes
3D Color Matrix
Center-Weighted
Spot

Metering range
3D Color Matrix Metering: EV 0 to 20
Center-Weighted Metering: EV 0 to 20
Spot Metering: EV 2 to 20
[at normal temperature (20°C/68°F), ISO 100 equivalent, f/1.4 lens]
Meter Coupling CPU and AI (Automatic maximum aperture indexing)
AE Lock Locked using AE-L/AF-L button

Shutter
Combined mechanical and CCD electronic shutter
30 to 1/16000 sec
Steps of 1/3 or 1/2 EV
Flash X-Sync: up to 1/500 sec
Bulb

Metering TTL full-aperture exposure metering system
3D color matrix metering II
1005 segment RGB sensor
Center-weighted: Weight of 75% (8mm circle) given to 6, 8, 10, or 13-mm circle in center of frame, or weighting based on average of entire frame
Spot: Meters 3.5 mm circle (about 2.5% of frame) centered on active focus area

LCD monitor
2.5 ” TFT LCD
Tempered glass coating
235,000 pixels
Backlight / brightness adjustment

Shooting modes
Single
Continuous Full image - 5 fps

[brahym]

shutter 1/16000s tu power sengsangat...boleh percaya ker?

[ikanmasin]

mak uh...betul ker apa yg kunampak... 1/16000s tu...pergh...

[brahym]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

[Darmansyah]

komen aku lak...
D200 nih mcm dicipta lebih khas untk NIKON MINI STUDIO

[alongarts]

apa itu mini studio?

[Darmansyah]

apa itu mini studio?
bahaya kalo bcakap ngan along nih...
takkan la photographer IMAGEWAVE tak tau... :wink:

[dbins]

NIKON MINI STUDIO tu apa... aku pu tak tau gak ni...? :roll:


komen aku lak...
D200 nih mcm dicipta lebih khas untk NIKON MINI STUDIO

[bimmer_man]

bahaya kalo bcakap ngan along nih...
takkan la photographer IMAGEWAVE tak tau... :wink:

ala.. jawap je.. memang dia tak tau tu.. aku pun tak tau jugak... most of us memang takde basic formal education dalam photography ni.. :)

[Darmansyah]

aku pon tatau gak...saje je kelentong korng..
len kali jgn percaya la...
hehehe....

[bimmer_man]

tak baik kelentong.. ada ilmu meh la kongsi sama2.. :wink:

[Darmansyah]

ilmu kelentong ada la bro..
banyak tuh...nak sikit ke?
hehehe...

[yokozuna]

mini studio yg ader lampu cam payung semer tu ke???? pastu ader kamera diatas tripod tu ke???
studio bukan mini tu plak yg camaner? cam studio sri angkasa tu ke??ke macam universal studios florida etc tu??
:D :D :D :D

[tembeling]

D200! Impressive piece of camera....so people said. But I know nuts about most of the features :D

[myusufm]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

kenapa?

[brahym]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

kenapa?

Both CCDs and CMOS imagers can offer excellent imaging performance when designed properly. CCDs have traditionally provided the performance benchmarks in the photographic, scientific, and industrial applications that demand the highest image quality (as measured in quantum efficiency and noise) at the expense of system size. CMOS imagers offer more integration (more functions on the chip), lower power dissipation (at the chip level), and the possibility of smaller system size, but they have often required tradeoffs between image quality and device cost. Today there is no clear line dividing the types of applications each can serve. CMOS designers have devoted intense effort to achieving high image quality, while CCD designers have lowered their power requirements and pixel sizes. As a result, you can find CCDs in low-cost low-power cellphone cameras and CMOS sensors in high-performance professional and industrial cameras, directly contradicting the early stereotypes. It is worth noting that the producers succeeding with "crossovers" have almost always been established players with years of deep experience in both technologies.

Costs are similar at the chip level. Early CMOS proponents claimed CMOS imagers would be much cheaper because they could be produced on the same high-volume wafer processing lines as mainstream logic or memory chips. This has not been the case. The accommodations required for good imaging perfomance have required CMOS designers to iteratively develop specialized, optimized, lower-volume mixed-signal fabrication processes--very much like those used for CCDs. Proving out these processes at successively smaller lithography nodes (0.35um, 0.25um, 0.18um...) has been slow and expensive; those with a captive foundry have an advantage because they can better maintain the attention of the process engineers.

[tembeling]

Yang penting...."CCDs and CMOS will remain complementary. The choice continues to depend on the application and the vendor more than the technology"(1)

Reference:
1. http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp

[zainzubir]

apa itu mini studio?

kalau alongarts yg prof tak paham..apakan lagi saya nih huh...cuba try explain skit....saya memang ada simpan angan2 nak beli lagi satu dslr ,mungkin 20D..simpan angan2 jer..yg korang igt apa??korang igt kak zain cop duit ker??

[brahym]

mini studio tu apa?

[zzoux]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

kenapa?

Both CCDs and CMOS imagers can offer excellent imaging performance when designed properly. CCDs have traditionally provided the performance benchmarks in the photographic, scientific, and industrial applications that demand the highest image quality (as measured in quantum efficiency and noise) at the expense of system size. CMOS imagers offer more integration (more functions on the chip), lower power dissipation (at the chip level), and the possibility of smaller system size, but they have often required tradeoffs between image quality and device cost. Today there is no clear line dividing the types of applications each can serve. CMOS designers have devoted intense effort to achieving high image quality, while CCD designers have lowered their power requirements and pixel sizes. As a result, you can find CCDs in low-cost low-power cellphone cameras and CMOS sensors in high-performance professional and industrial cameras, directly contradicting the early stereotypes. It is worth noting that the producers succeeding with "crossovers" have almost always been established players with years of deep experience in both technologies.

Costs are similar at the chip level. Early CMOS proponents claimed CMOS imagers would be much cheaper because they could be produced on the same high-volume wafer processing lines as mainstream logic or memory chips. This has not been the case. The accommodations required for good imaging perfomance have required CMOS designers to iteratively develop specialized, optimized, lower-volume mixed-signal fabrication processes--very much like those used for CCDs. Proving out these processes at successively smaller lithography nodes (0.35um, 0.25um, 0.18um...) has been slow and expensive; those with a captive foundry have an advantage because they can better maintain the attention of the process engineers.


Facts and Fiction

1. CMOS imagers offer superior integration, power dissipation and system size at the expense of image quality (particularly in low light) and flexibility. They are the technology of choice for high-volume, spaceconstrained applications where image quality requirements are low.

This makes them a natural fit for security cameras, PC videoconferencing, wireless handheld device videoconferencing, bar-code scanners, fax machines, consumer scanners, toys, biometrics and some automotive invehicle uses.


2. CCDs offer superior image quality and flexibility at the expense of system size.

They remain the most suitable technology for high-end imaging applications, such as digital photography, broadcast television, high-performance industrial imaging, and most scientific and medical
applications.

[petrofsky]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

kenapa?

Both CCDs and CMOS imagers can offer excellent imaging performance when designed properly. CCDs have traditionally provided the performance benchmarks in the photographic, scientific, and industrial applications that demand the highest image quality (as measured in quantum efficiency and noise) at the expense of system size. CMOS imagers offer more integration (more functions on the chip), lower power dissipation (at the chip level), and the possibility of smaller system size, but they have often required tradeoffs between image quality and device cost. Today there is no clear line dividing the types of applications each can serve. CMOS designers have devoted intense effort to achieving high image quality, while CCD designers have lowered their power requirements and pixel sizes. As a result, you can find CCDs in low-cost low-power cellphone cameras and CMOS sensors in high-performance professional and industrial cameras, directly contradicting the early stereotypes. It is worth noting that the producers succeeding with "crossovers" have almost always been established players with years of deep experience in both technologies.

Costs are similar at the chip level. Early CMOS proponents claimed CMOS imagers would be much cheaper because they could be produced on the same high-volume wafer processing lines as mainstream logic or memory chips. This has not been the case. The accommodations required for good imaging perfomance have required CMOS designers to iteratively develop specialized, optimized, lower-volume mixed-signal fabrication processes--very much like those used for CCDs. Proving out these processes at successively smaller lithography nodes (0.35um, 0.25um, 0.18um...) has been slow and expensive; those with a captive foundry have an advantage because they can better maintain the attention of the process engineers.


Facts and Fiction

1. CMOS imagers offer superior integration, power dissipation and system size at the expense of image quality (particularly in low light) and flexibility. They are the technology of choice for high-volume, spaceconstrained applications where image quality requirements are low.

This makes them a natural fit for security cameras, PC videoconferencing, wireless handheld device videoconferencing, bar-code scanners, fax machines, consumer scanners, toys, biometrics and some automotive invehicle uses.


2. CCDs offer superior image quality and flexibility at the expense of system size.

They remain the most suitable technology for high-end imaging applications, such as digital photography, broadcast television, high-performance industrial imaging, and most scientific and medical
applications.

Huhuhhhh ... well said encek zzoux ... CCD is still da best ... CMOS sucks ... uweks ... :lol:

[cgmulia]

jgn kata gitu....
kalau cmos s**k.. takkan canon guna teknologi tu utk kamera diorg...

petrosky.. kalau bolehlah.. elakkan penggunaan perkataan yg membawa atau memberi makna lucah.

agak kurang sesuai untuk kita gunakan ia di sini..

maaf ye... untuk kebaikan semua juga adanya

[petrofsky]

Uiks, sejak bila plak perkataan 'sucks' tu lucah??? hemmm ... musykil kejap ... atau ke ko yang interpret kot lain nih???

P/S: Aku tak kata Canon teruk, sebab hampir kebanyakkan reporter gamba lam dunia ni guna Canon ... aku cuma kata teknologi CMOS tu tak besh kalau nak dibandingkan ngan CCD ... Zzoux pon dah highlightkan, takkan aku cakap bende salah plak kott???

[yokozuna]

10.4 MP tapi still guna CCD? apapun, CMOS FF still da best.

kenapa?

Both CCDs and CMOS imagers can offer excellent imaging performance when designed properly. CCDs have traditionally provided the performance benchmarks in the photographic, scientific, and industrial applications that demand the highest image quality (as measured in quantum efficiency and noise) at the expense of system size. CMOS imagers offer more integration (more functions on the chip), lower power dissipation (at the chip level), and the possibility of smaller system size, but they have often required tradeoffs between image quality and device cost. Today there is no clear line dividing the types of applications each can serve. CMOS designers have devoted intense effort to achieving high image quality, while CCD designers have lowered their power requirements and pixel sizes. As a result, you can find CCDs in low-cost low-power cellphone cameras and CMOS sensors in high-performance professional and industrial cameras, directly contradicting the early stereotypes. It is worth noting that the producers succeeding with "crossovers" have almost always been established players with years of deep experience in both technologies.

Costs are similar at the chip level. Early CMOS proponents claimed CMOS imagers would be much cheaper because they could be produced on the same high-volume wafer processing lines as mainstream logic or memory chips. This has not been the case. The accommodations required for good imaging perfomance have required CMOS designers to iteratively develop specialized, optimized, lower-volume mixed-signal fabrication processes--very much like those used for CCDs. Proving out these processes at successively smaller lithography nodes (0.35um, 0.25um, 0.18um...) has been slow and expensive; those with a captive foundry have an advantage because they can better maintain the attention of the process engineers.


Facts and Fiction

1. CMOS imagers offer superior integration, power dissipation and system size at the expense of image quality (particularly in low light) and flexibility. They are the technology of choice for high-volume, spaceconstrained applications where image quality requirements are low.

This makes them a natural fit for security cameras, PC videoconferencing, wireless handheld device videoconferencing, bar-code scanners, fax machines, consumer scanners, toys, biometrics and some automotive invehicle uses.


2. CCDs offer superior image quality and flexibility at the expense of system size.

They remain the most suitable technology for high-end imaging applications, such as digital photography, broadcast television, high-performance industrial imaging, and most scientific and medical
applications.

Huhuhhhh ... well said encek zzoux ... CCD is still da best ... CMOS sucks ... uweks ... :lol:

ermmm nk senang bg aku pk camni...cam amd ngan pentium..msg2 ader kelebihan & kekurangan....

[cgmulia]

itu yg aku risau
kalau2 ia disalah ertikan...
so...
gunakan bahasa yg sesuai..

maaflah...
hanya memantau shj...

[myusufm]

cool down everyone..tapi cg,rase takde org yang terasa sangat kat sinih...
dan petrofsky hendak menunjukkan bahawa die adalah kipas susah mati ccd..dan aku menyokong die..haha...

balik pada d200...sape nak beli d70 aku,aku nak beli d200...hehehe....

[mr_bun]

betul tu myusufm..sejuk bawah semua orang...
ccd ke cmos ke...janji kita gunakan kamera kita sebaik yg ada ( master your camera la bak kata yokozuna..hehe )..kalau ada ccd ke cmos..stok simpan dalam peti baik pakai kamera pakai buang je..senang hehehee :lol:



uu teringin nak trade D50 aku ngan D200 aa....ahahaha
( baru lepas tgk pamplet D200 kat kedai kamera kelmarin..uuu cair beb! )

[brahym]

chill out..

anyway high end dslr nikon pun guna CMOS utk model dee too exe nya. CMOS dah terbukti dlm low noise utk high ISO. Org kata CCD ni dust sucker [maaf guna perkataan ni].

my 2 cent

[brahym]

Lg satu..kepadatan pixel dlm sensor tu mempengaruhi quality gambar. Sebab tu gambar2 PNS kebanyakkan noise yang tinggi dan less detail sebab high MP packed in small sensor. So sebab tu aku berpendapat full frame tu lebih baik.

my 2 cent again

[yokozuna]

chill out..

anyway high end dslr nikon pun guna CMOS utk model dee too exe nya. CMOS dah terbukti dlm low noise utk high ISO. Org kata CCD ni dust sucker [maaf guna perkataan ni].

my 2 cent

bang brahym sentiasa memberi hujah2 yg kukuh!!! dan sentiasa relevan....ekekekeke :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[AyAres151]

saper mau tolak D70s dorang tuh... PM ese... cepat2 la korang simpan duit angkat d200 nih... dan let go d70s korang pada aku.. wakkakaaa.

[cgmulia]

kalau takde yg terasa baguslah...

menghindar lebih baik dr mengubati.

kekekekkeke


ganer2 pun... d70s sudah memadai utk aku

[brahym]

saper mau tolak D70s dorang tuh... PM ese... cepat2 la korang simpan duit angkat d200 nih... dan let go d70s korang pada aku.. wakkakaaa.

menangguk dia air yang keruh nih...kui kui kui

[tembeling]

Dengan lens 18-200 VRII tu....18-70 & 55-200 mmg dah tak perlu :D Kalau saya nak let-go saya punya brand new D70s....kene jual dekali dgn dua-dua lens tu :D Ada berani?

[tualamerah]

Dengan lens 18-200 VRII tu....18-70 & 55-200 mmg dah tak perlu :D Kalau saya nak let-go saya punya brand new D70s....kene jual dekali dgn dua-dua lens tu :D Ada berani?

Sabar semua... d200 baru lagi diumum... dan setidak2-nyer kita semua menunggu paling tidak 2-3 bulan barulah kita dapat lihat ianya kelihatan diatas para kat kedai sana tuh... dan tak ada satu pun "successful field test" yang kita lihat di internet yang selama ini telah menjadi sumber ilmu dan maklumat terbaru kita...

sebaiknya simpan dulu d70s korang jangan terus kemaruk nak jual.. mana tau tetiba mass production ada skit delay... tak pun jadi macam d70s tuh sampai malaysia skit ajer... kan teruk jadinyer...
____________________________
http://tualamerah.fotopages.com/

[tembeling]

Jangan risau.....Kalau je. :D

[myusufm]

Dengan lens 18-200 VRII tu....18-70 & 55-200 mmg dah tak perlu :D Kalau saya nak let-go saya punya brand new D70s....kene jual dekali dgn dua-dua lens tu :D Ada berani?

Sabar semua... d200 baru lagi diumum... dan setidak2-nyer kita semua menunggu paling tidak 2-3 bulan barulah kita dapat lihat ianya kelihatan diatas para kat kedai sana tuh... dan tak ada satu pun "successful field test" yang kita lihat di internet yang selama ini telah menjadi sumber ilmu dan maklumat terbaru kita...

sebaiknya simpan dulu d70s korang jangan terus kemaruk nak jual.. mana tau tetiba mass production ada skit delay... tak pun jadi macam d70s tuh sampai malaysia skit ajer... kan teruk jadinyer...
____________________________
http://tualamerah.fotopages.com/

d200 dah open untuk booking kat japun..akan kuar kat para para kedai pada 16 hb bulan depan..the japs are really good on time,,,
kalau nak tunggu field test,biar aku lah wat field test..hahha..
sape2 nak bg offer beli d70 aku? hehe

[cgmulia]

tp bygkan kalau dia jadi mcm d70s dulu

pastu kuar lak d200s
kekekek

[tembeling]

Takpe...nanti myusufm jual pulak D200 dia kat aku :D

[cgmulia]

hahahha
dia beli d200s...
ko pakai d200
ok lah tu
kekekek

[brahym]

nak tau gaks..berapa harga d200 nanti dipasaran?

[AyAres151]

erm... d70 yusuf?? erm..yusuf lak kat japang..camne nak beli tuh? jual body saja ke jual sekali ngan kits lens?

[tembeling]

Orang kata...dalam RM6999 gitu :D

[cgmulia]

d200 = rm 6999..
rasanya lebih kot... 5D dah brape..
koman2 murah sikit jek.

[tembeling]

USD1699 Body only. 18-200mm VRII is about RM2600

[yokozuna]

d200 = rm 6999..
rasanya lebih kot... 5D dah brape..
koman2 murah sikit jek.

aku tgk kt dpreview tu, d200 bezal sikit jer drpd 20d..tapi beza byk gak kalau banding ngan 5d...

[myusufm]

d200 rege die 238000 yen..lebih kurang 7K lebih sket...hehhe..yang tuh ngan kit lens vr tuh...lebih kurang aa ngan 20d masa kuar awal2 dulu..aku kalau beli mmg nak beli sinh sebab kalau kat mesia rse2 akan jadi cam kes d70 susah nak dapat..walaupun lebih murah di malaysia berbanding di jepun..hehe..cepat2 sapa nak tolong aku tambah modal nak beli d200..

btw aku takde kit lens la ayares..yang ade nikkor 24-85mm ngan apo macro 2 70-300mm (yang aku nak jual sekali la) kalau sanggup nak tambah lagi 1200 lebih kurang bleh la aku jual sekali tokina 12-24mm..hehe..

[brahym]

so kiranya harga tu still lg mampu dibeli oleh golongan kebanyakkan la yer...tapi rasanya harga tu pasti akan turun nanti..elakkan beli yang first batch sebab mungkin ada flaws..

[cgmulia]

tul tu...
kita tunggu dulu...
tgk apa komen org yg telah membelinya..
belajar dr kesilapan..

[AyAres151]

hehe...tunggu 2nd batch... baru takyah update firmware.. hehe.. biar bugs2 tuh habis di bunuh dulu..

[cgmulia]

mcm tu baru membeli secara bijak..
kekek

[xuan]

Bagus tul ruangan forum nih.. skurng2nya dpt jugak ilmu ttg Dslr nih.. camni br dikatakan 'forum' :mrgreen: ..

[alongarts]

soalan aku gak masih berlum terjawab... dan yg pasti ada org mengaku dia suka kelentong ... best ker kelentong org yer?

[dbins]

Eh... ye la... lamanya aku tunggu... dah masuk 7 pages dah ni... masih tak tau gak apa itu MINI STUDIO... Studio Traffic tau la aku... :lol:

[buntalshoot]

dengar khabar2 angin D200 datang stok cuma dgn bodi sahaja.... RM 6200... betul ker???

[cgmulia]

yup
dlm PM ada disebut..
ushar dlm FTZ pun ada gak..
tp tak tau lah kebenarannya

[Lily]

saya hanya mampoooo melihat :P

[sobriazmi]

D200 mmg c/w body...ada member bagitau...

[kRie]

komen aku lak...
D200 nih mcm dicipta lebih khas untk NIKON MINI STUDIO

hai..
saya budak baru belajar dan baru kat sini..
nak jugak tau kenapa d200 dicipta khas utk NIKON MINI STUDIO je..

err..NIKON MINI STUDIO tu plak apadia??
saya google dan carik kat website Nikon tak jumpa pun??

[xuan]

The D200 Finally Arrives

"The D200 should be available in store before the end of this month and will retail for RM6,888 (body Only)"...
*dipetik dr paper 'The Star' 20/12/05..

for more information, visit http://nikon.com.my/productitem.php?pid=823-dd2dd021cb

[brahym]

kat keycolor lleh dpt RM5899 rasanya [body only]

[PeLaris]

Spesifikasinya sudah "magnificient" tapi anjat gak bila telihat link nih...

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/NikonD ... ment02.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/articles/NikonD200/Images/battcompartment02.jpg)

[brahym]

kenapa dgn battery compartment dia?

[AyAres151]

ha ah PELARIS...kenapa dengan link bergambar tuh? ada apa2 tak kena ker?

[xuan]

Spesifikasinya sudah "magnificient" tapi anjat gak bila telihat link nih...

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/NikonD ... ment02.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/articles/NikonD200/Images/battcompartment02.jpg)


made in thailand :shock:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/NikonD200/Images/battcompartment02.jpg

[cgmulia]

normal lah bang..
takde yg made in japan dah la ni...

[brahym]

ada lg yang made in japan..contohnya iaitu....jeng jeng jeng..hilmi kasi jawab soalan ni...

[cgmulia]

hahhaa
aku tau. aku tau..
kekekek

[yokozuna]

ada lg yang made in japan..contohnya iaitu....jeng jeng jeng..hilmi kasi jawab soalan ni...

jeng jeng...tapi ape dia jawapannya cikgu brahym??? :roll: :roll:

mengikut kate sensei aku semalam, Nikon ni mmg depa buat kt luar negara sbb utk jimatkan kos. tapi R&D dan design semua mmg still buat kt Jepun. Tapi ader gak sesetengah product yg depa buat kt Jepun sbb ermm mungkin utk merahsiakan technology tu...macam D2X made in ape yer??

Orang Jepun kebanyakan suka Nikon sbb dulu mase perang antara Amerika vs Korea Utara ke Japan vs Russia, kamera yang digunakan mase perang tu ialah Nikon. Sebabnya kamera Nikon tahan lasak dan masih boleh digunakan di bawah paras beku. Suhu sekitar -10 darjah celcius tapi masih berfungsi. Kamera lain masa tu dah kong...
Tapi tu dulu, skarang dah lain. Teknology dah makin canggih....ekeke

[brahym]

aik takkan tak au jawapannya..cuba check kat belakang 20d mu tu..

[yokozuna]

aik takkan tak au jawapannya..cuba check kat belakang 20d mu tu..

hehe...tahu laa..buek2 tak tahu je :D Kiss N buatan ape ekk??
tapi lens 50mm F2.8 tu Made in Malaysia laa...beli kt Jepong :roll: :roll:

[yeop]

betul ah..buat kat Malaysia..kat mana ah kilang dia...

[brahym]

50m f2.8? Tu macro lens ke?

[PeLaris]

50mm f/2.8? Ada ke lensa sebegitu?
Atau 50mm f/1.8? :roll:

[zainzubir]

Made in Malaysia ke Thailand tak kisahlah tuh...now what they're concern on production cost, sedia maklum, kestabilan politik dan tenaga buruh kita masih murah....itu sebabnya...Mereka baik Nikon or Canon ada R&D mereka sendiri..tapi satu fakta hitam putih yg baru saya discover amt berguna utk dishare bersama dibawah ini...

.......................................

sila rujuk Advanced images Photography & Digital Imaging issue 22, Nov/Dec 2005 muka surat 26

"Yamashita who is well known among photo enthusiasts as a Nikon user, switches to CANON when it comes to digital. He says this because CANON has the EDGE IN DIGITAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY and the EDITORS at NATIONAL GEGRAPHIC think so too"

[PeLaris]

switches to CANON ?

Hahaha aunty, jwpannya masih lagi " Yes & No ".
Memang benar, teknologi Canon mengatasi yg lelain selama 5 tahun.

**** Oh 5D, dtglah dlm mimpi ku... :)

[sobriazmi]

well..semua bergantung pada user tu sendiri gak..
hehehhee

[PeLaris]

Tu la pasal, ramai yg guna Nikon & Canon. Pasai pa tak guna Minolta ke Sigma SD9 ke, Mamiya ZD SLR ke dan bermacam!

[yokozuna]

50mm f/2.8? Ada ke lensa sebegitu?
Atau 50mm f/1.8? :roll:

hehe..silap!!! gomen gomen
50mm f/1.8 laa :D Made In Malaysia....

[yokozuna]

Made in Malaysia ke Thailand tak kisahlah tuh...now what they're concern on production cost, sedia maklum, kestabilan politik dan tenaga buruh kita masih murah....itu sebabnya...Mereka baik Nikon or Canon ada R&D mereka sendiri..tapi satu fakta hitam putih yg baru saya discover amt berguna utk dishare bersama dibawah ini...

.......................................

sila rujuk Advanced images Photography & Digital Imaging issue 22, Nov/Dec 2005 muka surat 26

"Yamashita who is well known among photo enthusiasts as a Nikon user, switches to CANON when it comes to digital. He says this because CANON has the EDGE IN DIGITAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY and the EDITORS at NATIONAL GEGRAPHIC think so too"

ehehehhe..cayalah En Yamashita....(Ni cucu-cicik General Yamashita ke :roll: :roll: )..bos NG pakai kamera ape aunty???


**** Oh 5D, dtglah dlm mimpi ku...
datang dlm mimpi buat apee...dtg bergolek ke tangan ku laa...baru boleh ku petik2 button mu itu dgn jari-jemari ku ini..wekekekeke :lol:

mane cikgu brahym ni..letak laa banner @ sig. cam kt PM tu sini skali..ekekke

[PeLaris]

yokozuna menulis :-



datang dlm mimpi buat apee...dtg bergolek ke tangan ku laa...baru boleh ku petik2 button mu itu dgn jari-jemari ku ini..wekekekeke


Nanti nak call sugar mummy... ehekS!

[zainzubir]

yokozuna menulis :-



datang dlm mimpi buat apee...dtg bergolek ke tangan ku laa...baru boleh ku petik2 button mu itu dgn jari-jemari ku ini..wekekekeke


Nanti nak call sugar mummy... ehekS!


pelaris:jgn cari naas....guna duit sugar mummy baru tekan dua tiga kali terbako...hampeh..jika setakat kamera jer terbako takper lagi...jika dgn org2nya terbako??...nauzubilla...

[PeLaris]

Harlamak.. bukan eden arr,,, yokozuna tuh!!! :) :)

[zainzubir]

sapo2lah..den tak kigho... :lol: :lol: :lol:

[yokozuna]

Harlamak.. bukan eden arr,,, yokozuna tuh!!! :) :)

areee..ambo pulok keno :cry: :cry: :cry:
haa kan mama dah marah...

[AyAres151]

apo pasal buat kat thailand di pertikaikan??

bukan ke jepun bukak kilang di Thailand ke utk pasaran Thai, Vietnam, Laos, Mesia dan Singapore dan Brunei serta Indon? ke ese yang silap?

buatan thailand ada yang lagi okies apa dari buatan USA...

itu kalu tak silap ese laa

[buntalshoot]

Buatan Thailand, Buatan China, Buatan Jepun. Ini sebenarnya hak mereka(Nikon) utk memilih mana2 negara yg sesuai untuk dilantik sebagai pembuat dan pengeluar. Ini bergantung kepada bagaimana sesebuah negara tu menawarkan kemudahan dan kelebihan masing dari segi duti cukai, peluang pelaburan, kos tenaga kerja, kestabilan ekonomi, domestik dan sebagainya. Ini sebenarnya kelebihan Thailand yg telah dilantik Nikon Japan sebagai wakil pengeluar di sebelah Asia Tenggara. Aku rasa brg dan kualiti tetap sama kerana Nikon mesti nak jaga reputasinya....betul tak...? Yg jadi masalah selalunya bukannya kilang tetapi servis selepas jualan di setiap2 negara....

[brahym]

aku rasa canon pun patut buat kilang manufacturingnya kat china atau thailand. Besar kemungkinan harga 5D yang melebihi 12K itu disebabkan oleh kos pembuatan yang tinggi kat jepun. sebab tu harga d200 sangat2 murah...

ahaks...suka gak pada d200 dipairkan dengan 18-200 VR yang baru..then beli tu dua2 pun belum dpt body 5D lg..

d200 - 6K
18-200 VR - 2.6K
SB800 1.3K
Total = 9.9K..ada belen 2.1K leh ler belanja FM.com makan2 reramai tu hehehe

kelebihan d200 selain dari 10MP dia ada weather seal pulak...best tu..

[shaifulrizal]

aiyakk...apa la korang ni...sama gak macam levis...bukan sume buatan US...ada yg thailand ada penang dan ada s'pore....
berbalik kepada CMOS ngan CCD tu..memang betol cakap brahym...CMOS memang tinggi skit darjatnya dari CCD ...
tu sebab Canon tu mahal skit dari Nikon...salah satunya..dia guna CMOS..btol tak bang brem?? huhuhuhuhuu :roll:

[zainzubir]

aku rasa canon pun patut buat kilang manufacturingnya kat china atau thailand. Besar kemungkinan harga 5D yang melebihi 12K itu disebabkan oleh kos pembuatan yang tinggi kat jepun. sebab tu harga d200 sangat2 murah...

.

read single test canon eos 5D dlm chip photo video,9th edition-pg 44

[brahym]

aku rasa canon pun patut buat kilang manufacturingnya kat china atau thailand. Besar kemungkinan harga 5D yang melebihi 12K itu disebabkan oleh kos pembuatan yang tinggi kat jepun. sebab tu harga d200 sangat2 murah...

.

read single test canon eos 5D dlm chip photo video,9th edition-pg 44

a ah kak zain..saya terbaca kat majalah tu ler. Anyway 5D still da best semi-pro dslr cuma harganya je tak da best

[HBZ]

Assalamualaikum semua forumer

Antara dua jenama tadi, den rasolah, bagus atau tidak bergantung kepada owner dia. CCD atau CMOS mempuyani kelebihan tersendiri. Ada satu artikel perbandingan "noise". Canon dan Nikon, Canon excel better dalam area ni. Tapi harga untuk Model Canon tu 2 kali ganda dari Nikon.

Tapi den nak tanya kau orang semua, berapa peratus gambar yang kau orang snap guna ISO tinggi, setinggi-tinggi 1600. Lainlah kau orang ambil gambar malam selalu. Then, masa view dalam computer, adakah kau orang view 100% size.

Den selau guna range 200 - 500 ISO, hasil kira OK, kecuali kalau nak ambil imej close dan gunakan mikroskop, pencahayaan dan DOF amat kritikal.

Untuk general fotografi, den tak fikir kau orang ada masa nak fikir tu semua atau tak kisah.

Lagi satu saiz cetak yang paling popular dan murah 4R, jarang kau orang cerak sampai saiz besar. Betul tak.

Lama tak lama dalam komputer seminggu dua, lepas tu delete, snap yang baru, kalau burn dalam CD, simpan tempat lain, lepas tu lupa.

Lagi satu den suka guna mod Manual, Den kontrol kamera, bukan kamera kontrol den.

Pada tangan fotographer profesional, kamera cap ayam pun, hasil dia gerenti bagus.

[PeLaris]

HBZ..
ingatkan HBK shawn michaels tuH!

[HBZ]

HBZ..
ingatkan HBK shawn michaels tuH!

Tak lah

HBZ guess
HISHAMUDDIN BIN ZAINUDDIN. dulu cuba nak pakai nama HISHAM, banyak benar orang nama HISHAM. jadi den guna HBZ dan HISHAMZAIN, kalau hang jumpa HISHAMZAIN, den lah tu

[PeLaris]

hampir sama lakz ngan mamazain tuH!
tapi HISHAMZAIN ni pengguna nikon, mamazain lakz suka canon!
:)

[HBZ]

hampir sama lakz ngan mamazain tuH!
tapi HISHAMZAIN ni pengguna nikon, mamazain lakz suka canon!
:)

Kira orait lak nama MAMAZAIN, jangan MAMAKZAIN, filem LABU LABI, Tergolak den

[PeLaris]

HBZ.. skang guna d70 kan..
d200 ada jgk ke?

[HBZ]

HBZ.. skang guna d70 kan..
d200 ada jgk ke?

Huu, tak mampu den, body alone below 5.5K. D70S ni pun belum habis experimen. Berangan jelah, tapi kalu fulus ada lebih, mahu juga sambar D200 + 18-200 VR + 105 Micro VR + SB R200 + Bateri Grip MD-D200 dlllllllllllll.

[buntalshoot]

Assalamualaikum semua forumer

Antara dua jenama tadi, den rasolah, bagus atau tidak bergantung kepada owner dia. CCD atau CMOS mempuyani kelebihan tersendiri. Ada satu artikel perbandingan "noise". Canon dan Nikon, Canon excel better dalam area ni. Tapi harga untuk Model Canon tu 2 kali ganda dari Nikon.

Tapi den nak tanya kau orang semua, berapa peratus gambar yang kau orang snap guna ISO tinggi, setinggi-tinggi 1600. Lainlah kau orang ambil gambar malam selalu. Then, masa view dalam computer, adakah kau orang view 100% size.

Den selau guna range 200 - 500 ISO, hasil kira OK, kecuali kalau nak ambil imej close dan gunakan mikroskop, pencahayaan dan DOF amat kritikal.

Untuk general fotografi, den tak fikir kau orang ada masa nak fikir tu semua atau tak kisah.

Lagi satu saiz cetak yang paling popular dan murah 4R, jarang kau orang cerak sampai saiz besar. Betul tak.

Lama tak lama dalam komputer seminggu dua, lepas tu delete, snap yang baru, kalau burn dalam CD, simpan tempat lain, lepas tu lupa.

Lagi satu den suka guna mod Manual, Den kontrol kamera, bukan kamera kontrol den.

Pada tangan fotographer profesional, kamera cap ayam pun, hasil dia gerenti bagus.

setuju sangat2...
saya pun dah jarang guna A mode...

skang tengah belaja main2 manual mode
apa yang penting fahami kamera kita dan lens kita...
alhamdulillah, tangan kita pun insyaAllah setaraf VR atau IS! :D

[HBZ]

Assalamualaikum semua forumer

Antara dua jenama tadi, den rasolah, bagus atau tidak bergantung kepada owner dia. CCD atau CMOS mempuyani kelebihan tersendiri. Ada satu artikel perbandingan "noise". Canon dan Nikon, Canon excel better dalam area ni. Tapi harga untuk Model Canon tu 2 kali ganda dari Nikon.

Tapi den nak tanya kau orang semua, berapa peratus gambar yang kau orang snap guna ISO tinggi, setinggi-tinggi 1600. Lainlah kau orang ambil gambar malam selalu. Then, masa view dalam computer, adakah kau orang view 100% size.

Den selau guna range 200 - 500 ISO, hasil kira OK, kecuali kalau nak ambil imej close dan gunakan mikroskop, pencahayaan dan DOF amat kritikal.

Untuk general fotografi, den tak fikir kau orang ada masa nak fikir tu semua atau tak kisah.

Lagi satu saiz cetak yang paling popular dan murah 4R, jarang kau orang cerak sampai saiz besar. Betul tak.

Lama tak lama dalam komputer seminggu dua, lepas tu delete, snap yang baru, kalau burn dalam CD, simpan tempat lain, lepas tu lupa.

Lagi satu den suka guna mod Manual, Den kontrol kamera, bukan kamera kontrol den.

Pada tangan fotographer profesional, kamera cap ayam pun, hasil dia gerenti bagus.

setuju sangat2...
saya pun dah jarang guna A mode...

skang tengah belaja main2 manual mode
apa yang penting fahami kamera kita dan lens kita...
alhamdulillah, tangan kita pun insyaAllah setaraf VR atau IS! :D

Paling afdal, setiap shot yang terbaik atau you fikir baik, simpan exif dia untuk future reference

Thanks, jom balik solat jumaat

[PeLaris]

sambung lepas solat..

eh... lupa plakz.. sape tau camneR nak hide exif terus dari kamera kat foto tu,
maknanya ilang terus, pekerja lab tak tau apa dedahan yg kita gunakan..
kalo nak wat kat photoshop, lambat lakz kan kan kan..

[harummanis]

haloo... lama dah topic nie tak aktif...

so.. kepada yang dah beli D200, boleh bagi review n pendapat anda tentang pengguna D200 nie? dengar cerita best. yang pastinya, orang yg dah ada D200 saja tau macam mana best nya D200 tu.. boleh share info? thanks!

[harummanis]

Made in Malaysia ke Thailand tak kisahlah tuh...now what they're concern on production cost, sedia maklum, kestabilan politik dan tenaga buruh kita masih murah....itu sebabnya...Mereka baik Nikon or Canon ada R&D mereka sendiri..tapi satu fakta hitam putih yg baru saya discover amt berguna utk dishare bersama dibawah ini...

.......................................

sila rujuk Advanced images Photography & Digital Imaging issue 22, Nov/Dec 2005 muka surat 26

"Yamashita who is well known among photo enthusiasts as a Nikon user, switches to CANON when it comes to digital. He says this because CANON has the EDGE IN DIGITAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY and the EDITORS at NATIONAL GEGRAPHIC think so too"

Unty Zain... rasanya Micheal Yamashita tu dah start guna Canon (Eos-1v) sejak dia buat penggambaran National Geographic pasal Marco Polo. masa tu rasanya belum keluar D-SLR atau masih dalam peringkat awal pendedahan kepada D-SLR.

National Geographic pernah duna D1X masa model tu baru keluar, untuk artikel "100 year's of flight"...

yang pastinya, dalam majalalah National Geography, kalau dulu dok nampak ramai yg guna nikon, tapi yang pastinya dah semakin ramai guna canon walaupun ke outdoor assignment. iklan canon n olympus juga mendominasi dlm majalah national geography.

[harummanis]

Man... saya rasala, kenapa Man cakap D200 tu untuk "NIKON MINI STUDIO"... antara sebabnya ialah pertama skali D200 ada PC-sync output utk flash (untuk kita cucuk kabel untuk trigger external flash atau studio flash), keduanya sbb saiz pixel yg agak besar (10mgpxl), boleh la guna utk 'mini studio' nyer shot. dan yg ketiganya, harganya lebih murah dari D2X. hehe!

begitu ka Man?