View Full Version : Lens 70-300mm terbaik utk dibeli
eastone
2nd January 2006, 02:25 PM
My next target lens ialah red ring lens nih...sebab harga yg mampu dibeli..tak mampu nak beli lens f/2.8 lagi...
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/images/LensesImage/128_small.jpg
so...ade sesaper yg penah pakai lens nih??
leh komen skit tak ??
thanx...
cgmulia
2nd January 2006, 02:32 PM
err.. rasanya ada dah org citer pasal nih..
sila scroll down utk mencari topik pasal lens ni..
tq
eastone
3rd January 2006, 11:26 AM
leh tak kalau nak compare 3 lens nih...
1. Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/images/LensesImage/128_small.jpg
2. Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 LD Macro
http://mk29.image.pbase.com/u38/equipment/upload/24964348.a70300macro.gif
3. Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G
http://www.nikon.com.my/products/90/e00cd4c502/standard/70-300_4-56G_02_s.jpg
mane lagi bagus dari segi peformance...
Edoras
3rd January 2006, 11:50 AM
#1 dan #2 tu jenis Canon atau Nikon?
yokozuna
3rd January 2006, 12:00 PM
#1 dan #2 tu jenis Canon atau Nikon?
Ia dipanggil Canon mount ataupun Nikon mount..
yg #2 of course laa Nikon mount sbb Nikkor lens...yg #1 tak pasti..tapi binaan lens same je cuma mount jer yg berbeza.
Vote for #2..orang kate Nikkor glass adelah antara yg terbaik...
eastone
3rd January 2006, 12:07 PM
hmmm...tapi kebanyakan photografer recommend Sigma....
ade komen??
kudean
3rd January 2006, 12:54 PM
ntah ler .. tp byk review rekemen sigma .. coz of the APO class tuh .. apo bondo eh ? . ese tak ingat la .. maap la yo ..
rgds
sobriazmi
3rd January 2006, 01:10 PM
tamron camna plakk
abahwafi
3rd January 2006, 02:08 PM
Aku penah pakai Tamron 70-300mm, tapi recommend Sigma APO. Takyah beli yg nikon pon takpe sbb range 70-300mm bukan dlm range semi/pro lens. Kalau tgk lens construction Nikon tu SEBIJIK cam Tamron punyer.
tembeling
3rd January 2006, 02:14 PM
Betul tu. Sigma pun OK kut...unless nak ambik 300mm f/4 atau 300mm f/2.8 :D
eastone
3rd January 2006, 02:49 PM
nape ade review yg tulis Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super II ekk??
nengok website sigma takde pun Super II tuh...
thanx...
arie_gaban
29th January 2006, 09:07 PM
aku masih banyak perlu belajar pasal lense nie..orang kata malu bertanya sesat jalan..
jadik apa beza f/4 atau f/2.8 tue..
arie_gaban
1st February 2006, 09:56 PM
dah paham skit2..jenuh tekan tiap2 thread..
apa recomendation untuk lense yang bleh digunakan untuk tangkap gambar jauh..
ikanmasin
6th February 2006, 08:41 AM
bulan dpn nak sambaq 300mm lak.....heheheee...
impissa
10th February 2006, 01:52 AM
aku nak menyampuk ,kut2 aku jawab betul..kalau tak silap..f/4 exposurenya kecil..cahaya susah nak amsuk banyak tapi kalau f/2.8 tu.cahaya boleh masuk banyak.. jadi lensnya lebih besar, yang yang pro dok pakai besau2.. suapya kalau dalam keadaan kelabu asap.. pic dapat dirakamkan tanpa menggunakan flashpun kira dah cantik warenggek...tu keistimewaannya.. tu sbb harganya mahal...kalau f4 agak murah sedikit..lagi satu.. kalau f2.8 agak beart.. selalunya dipakai pinggang dia dengan colar stand,bubuh tripod kat situ..berat siul.. kalau f4..kurang ebrat sikit..so,pilihlah mana yang nak pakai..pilihan ditangan anda..
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.2 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.